Skip links

Law

REAL ESTAE (PART-2)

Joint venture, collaboration agreement for construction whether services under consumer ‘the words ‘joint venture’ or ‘collaboration’ in the title of an agreement or even in the body of the agreement will not make the transaction a joint venture, if there are no provisions for shared

REAL ESTATE (PART-1)

M.K.Gupta V Lukhnow Development Authority SC 1993 Late possession/ No possession/ Defective dwelling/ Area less/ Cost escalation/ Forfeiture of registration fee in case of cancellation of flat/ Approach road dispute Facts of the case Authority invited applications from home buyers, applications were more than flats

MEDICAL NEGLIGENC (PART-3)

Malay Kumar Ganguli&Dr Kunal Saha V Dr Sukumar Mukherjee and others delivered on 7th August 2009 SCC 221 Bench: S.B. Sinha, Deepak Verma ; Supreme Court Of India Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal Nos. 1191-1194 Of 2005 A. “A court is not bound by the evidence

MEDICAL NEGLIGENC (PART-2)

Dr J.J. Marchant and others v/s Shrinath Chaturvedi 2002 CTJ 757SC[CP] Supreme Court again set the controversy at rest about the jurisdiction of consumer courts in medical negligence matters Court in this case also relying upon Shantha case, held that delay in disposal of the

MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE PART-1

V.Shantha V/S Indian Medical Association SC 1995 Distinction between ‘contract of service’ and ‘contract for service’ “No doubt that Parliamentary draftsman was aware of this well accepted distinction between "contract of service" and "contract for services" and has deliberately chosen the expression `contract of service'

Landmark judgment on Insurance

1. Case Title: New India Assurance Co. Ltd v/s M/S Mudit Roadways (SC) Civil Appeal No 334/2023 Decided on 24.1.2023 by SC Legal Issue: Repudiation of claim on new grounds “it is a settled position that an insurance company cannot travel beyond the grounds mentioned

Safety of Locker under Bank custody-Know the Rules and law

Supreme Court decided case of Amitabh Dasgupta on 19.2.2021 holding bank negligent for break opening the locker for non-payment of dues for the period of 1993 -1994 and locker was subsequently re allocated to another customer. This fact came to the knowledge of locker holder
Need Help?