admin – Page 7 – Consumer Awakening Mission

Consumer Commissions are additional remedy available to the consumers

(Section 3of act 19867 Section 100 of Act 2019) Questions raised Banking system-Ombudsman system, Debt Recovery Tribunal Case law: Neela Vasanta v/s among industries, FD matter NC 1993 Registrar Co-operative Societies -Arbitration by Registrar Case Law: Kalavati v/s Vaishya Co-operative Society SC Medical Negligence: Medical

Safety of Locker under Bank custody-Know the Rules and law

Supreme Court decided case of Amitabh Dasgupta on 19.2.2021 holding bank negligent for break opening the locker for non-payment of dues for the period of 1993 -1994 and locker was subsequently re allocated to another customer. This fact came to the knowledge of locker holder

Manu Solanki & 8 Ors V/S Vinayaka Mission University&24 Others

Consumer Case No. 261 Of 2012 &Other Cases (New Dimensions To “Education As Service”) Note –The above order is under challenge before the Supreme Court, admitted and notice issued Supreme Court admits an appeal related to education as service under CP Act Supreme Court has

Landowners are also Liable Along with Builder for Deficiencies in Flat Constructions, SC

The Supreme Court held “ A revocation of power of attorney executed between landowners and builder for developing their land would not absolve the landowners from being jointly and severally liable along with the builder in a consumer case for deficiency of service.” Case Details

Home buyers can chose remedy incase developer fails to give possession

SC in a recent case decided on 07.04.2022 takes a very liberal view in favour of home buyers who invested their hard earned money in developers project but does not get possession within stipulated time Case Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Sushma Ashok Shiroor ;Civil

Historic Judgment by five Judges Constitution Bench: Removing Article 370 from the constitution

Case Title: In Re Article 370 of the Constitution of India Citation: 2023 Live Law (SC) 1050 Appearance for the Petitioners: Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subramanium, Zaffar Shah, Rajeev Dhavan, Dushyant Dave, Chander Uday Singh, Dinesh Dwivedi, Shekhar Naphade, Nitya Ramakrishnan, Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Menaka

Development of Consumer Jurisprudence in India

(Supreme Court sets Law) The judgments which contributed to develop Consumer Jurisprudence 1 Bombay High court struck down Rue 6(1) of Rule 2020 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Legal issue ;Appointment of Presidents & Members in Consumer Commissions ) Dominance of executives over Judicial Person,

How to draft consumer Complaint

(Lacuna left in complaint drafting leads to failure even in meritorious case) Drafting Consumer Complaint is an art. The fact that consumer do not need to appoint an advocate does not mean complaint can be drafted in any manner without following the basic principles of

HOME BUYER A FINANCIAL CREDITOR

The Supreme Court in the case of Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited & Anr v. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 43 of 2019) has held that the homebuyers from now onwards shall be considered as Financial Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Difference between RTI &CP Act as long as providing information is concerned

Understand the difference between information through RTI and information through CP Act Under RTI you may apply to any ministry, office, organisations covered under RTI for any information if you are entitled to get that/directly concerned with the information you want Under CP Act information

Why Can’t Client Be “Consumer” & Lawyer’s Negligent for “Deficiency of Service” Under Consumer Protection Act? SC asks Bar Association

HEAD NOTES While hearing a very important case of Advocates Association on 22 Feb 2024 in the matter of Bar of Indian Lawyers Through Its President Jasbir Sigh Malik Vs. D.K. Gandhi Ps National Institute of Communicable Diseases., (Diary No.- 27751 – 2007) Supreme Court

CCPA has jurisdiction to initiate proceeding suo moto against enterprise

Case Title Cloudtail India Private Limited.Versus Central Consumer Protection Authority CCPA Appeal No. 4 Of 2022 (Against the Order dated 04/11/2022 in Complaint No. J-25/72/2021 of the CCPA DELHI) HEAD NOTES CCPA directs Cloudtail India Private Limited to recall 1033 pressure cookers, sold by the

Bombay High court struck down Rue 6(1) of Rule 2020 of Consumer Protection Act 2019

The burning question of the day is as to whether Judgment passed by the Hon’ble High court of Maharashtra ,Pune bench shall invalidate all the process followed by the selection committee for filing as many as 112 vacancies of Presidents /Members of Consumer commissions in

Earning Income from Rent

Earning rental income are not consumers Title: Earning Rental Income are not 'Consumers' under CP Act 2019 Description: Buyers Purchasing Units To Earn Rental Profit Are Not "Consumers": NCDRC Dismisses Complaint Against M3M India, Martial Buildcon, M-Worth Services Keywords Consumers Consumer Protection Act 2019 NCDRC

Social Connect

Author: admin